![]() ![]() Twenty-eight included frameworks were underpinned at least in part by one or more of three different theoretical approaches, namely persuasive communication, diffusion of innovations theory, and social marketing. Thirty-three frameworks met our inclusion criteria, 20 of which were designed to be used by researchers to guide their dissemination activities. For each included paper, the source, the date of publication, a description of the main elements of the framework, and whether there was any implicit/explicit reference to theory were extracted. References were screened independently by at least two reviewers disagreements were resolved by discussion. Papers which mentioned dissemination (but did not provide any detail) in the context of a wider knowledge translation framework, were excluded. To be included, papers had to present an explicit framework or plan either designed for use by researchers or that could be used to guide dissemination activity. We searched twelve electronic databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO), the reference lists of included studies and of individual funding agency websites to identify potential studies for inclusion. Against this background, we performed a systematic scoping to identify and describe any conceptual/organising frameworks that could be used by researchers to guide their dissemination activity. Moreover, the expectations and guidance provided to researchers vary from one agency to another. ![]() However, there is lack of clarity between funding agencies as to what represents dissemination. New York: Oxford University Press 2018.Addressing deficiencies in the dissemination and transfer of research-based knowledge into routine clinical practice is high on the policy agenda both in the UK and internationally. Brownson RC, Coldtiz GA, Proctor EK, editors. 2002.Äissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. Designing for Dissemination: Conference Summary Report. Integrating research, practice, and policy: what we see depends on where we stand. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Research to Practice. Terminology fo dissemination and implementation research In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA Proctor EK, editors. Designing for dissemination among public health researchers: findings from a national survey in the United States. D&I researchers report substantial misalignment of incentives and behaviors related to dissemination to non-research audiences.Ä«rownson RC, Jacobs JA, Tabak RG, Hoehner CM, Stamatakis KA. Methods to engage different stakeholders deserve more in-depth investigation. There have been increases in stakeholder engagement, but few other practices since the 2012 survey, and some differences across subgroups. Stakeholder involvement in research was common, with clinical and community-based researchers engaging stakeholder groups in broadly similar ways, but with critical differences noted between researchers with greater seniority, those with more D&I training, those based in the United States vs. Journal publication was identified as the most impactful on respondents' careers (94%), but face-to-face meetings with stakeholders were rated as most impactful on practice or policy (40%). Respondents indicated routinely engaging in a variety of dissemination-related activities, with academic journal publications (88%), conference presentations (86%), and reports to funders (74%) being the most frequent. (69%) or Canada (13%), representing a mix of clinical (28%) and community settings (34%). The majority of respondents were from university or research settings in the United States. Surveys were received from 210 participants. Methods to disseminate to and engage non-research stakeholders were assessed using an online survey sent to a broad, diverse sample of D&I scientists. The present project sought to describe dissemination practices and engagement of stakeholders among dissemination & implementation (D&I) scientists. There has been an increasing focus on disseminating research findings, but less about practices specific to disseminating and engaging non-researchers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |